|
Link to information on
pursuing a Class Action
Vinyl Banners.....
ECO SITES - how it COULD be done - how it
SHOULD be done
Our Homes on Video
Rowner Village Residents
myspace.com/rownerdestruction
SCHNEWS
UNDERCURRENTS
Private
Eye
Ecology Building Society
INDYMEDIA - Pathfinder Disgrace
Gosport Council - Housing Dept
Informative letters in 'The News'
www.peterviggers.co.uk
www.page22.co.uk
Meridian TV
BBC South
The Independent
Daily Telegraph
Guardian

Greed.

The Beiderbecke
Affair - it makes
it all so clear.

|
Updated
27th January 2010 - CLICK ON HEADING FOR LATEST SITE UPDATE
Who
will buy the new houses? (if they are built)
The 'Masterplan' Explained.... or, how to try and take people's homes
from them,
then tell them you are doing them a favour.
"AFFORDABLE" HOUSING - what a joke
THE
CULPRITS!! How can anyone be proud of
achieving THIS?
Tesco,
Taylor Wimpey, Destruction -
sound familiar?

Beware
of Wimpey 'Homes'
“If people still have concerns, they should
go and discuss them individually with the Partnership.” which is rather like asking the executioner for a
pardon....
  
Perfectly
good homes, being emptied, and left....the 'SOLD' signs added later are
just an attempt
to make this disaster look respectable.
THIS is what our homes are
worth, according to this court transcript.
£6000 homes sold for £42,000.
Some History....... or,who sold them - who built them?
Hands off Our Homes!!!!!!!!! - others are fighting around the country,
and are in
EXACTLY the
same situation as the people in Rowner. PUBLIC CONSULTATION????
How Taylor Wimpey operate. - and here. Problems with Tesco??
More 'Public Consultation' ...... more corruption
Another
lucrative development here...... HOME loss payments???? (30/11/07)
Councillor sacked for being
honest!!!!!!!!!!!
Whose idea was it that we should lose our homes? Who decided we would
only be
told half the story? Why should I lose what I've worked 22 years for?
See LATEST NEWS.
Try watching 'The Beiderbecke Affair', by Alan Plater. It's all happened
before, and it's happening now. PortsmouthCorruptionCompany
|
Don't
forget, if you own your home, you are sitting on the land, which is the
most expensive part. If PHA pay you £100,000 for your home, that has cost them £100,000, and
you cannot afford another one in the area. If a new one costs
£80,000 to build,(or LESS!) it has cost them £80,000, and
you still have a home. Think about it. Self-build? That has been
totally ignored in this scheme. That is because it is all about PROFIT, not benefitting the residents.
Here in Gosport, Hampshire, it was
announced out of the blue,to 'about' five hundred private homeowners,
that their homes are to be destroyed in the name of 'Rowner Renewal', but
in reality, there are over 1000 homes under threat,from the Tesco Express shop
southwards.We were NEVER consulted as to
whether we wished our homes to be destroyed. It has proven impossible
to extract any useful information from the people responsible.
What is planned for the area south of the Tesco Express shop? How can
this be 'Public Consultation', when our questions ARE NOT ANSWERED?
The UK government has been defeated once, already, because of its
failure to carry out PROPER public consultation on nuclear power.
There has been NO proper consultation on this scheme, especially since
it started without even asking if residents wished to have their homes
destroyed. Also, the false information put out regarding the number of
homes under threat definitely negates any argument that this is a
genuine consultation process. It is planned to build 'a sustainable community'. This does not mean
eco-housing, with solar panels, wind generators, large play areas for
children, away from cars and roads, (as we have now) just hundreds of
stunted boxes, designed to generate as much wealth as possible for the
developers, with a large (probably) Tesco shop for the 'lucky'
residents. Plus a tower block for the wealthy to view the Solent. Of
course, the end result never looks like the pretty drawings first put
on display, to put you off the scent. THIS is what happens - Pathfinder Disaster - homes in the north and the midlands
destroyed. Don't let it happen here. Have a look at this info on the RVRA site - this is what will happen to you and your home. (and
John Prescott now advises the Chinese on new, sustainable cities , plus after-dinner speeches on
REGENERATION! Can you believe it????)
The amount of time allowed for 'public consultation' has been kept to a
minimum, so that the destruction can start as soon as possible. GBC
intend to start felling trees by the road in Magennis Close, yet there
'are no plans yet'... GBC has a legal responsibility to
ensure the consultation process is carried out correctly. With so
little information available to the residents concerned, and so few
questions answered, they are not fulfilling this responsibility.
However often you ask questions, you do not receive answers. One hour
spent in a local hall, after a days work, trying to study information
that has not previously been seen, is hardly fair on residents at risk
of losing their homes. This is all loaded in favour of the developers.
Were you told EVERYTHING when you bought your property? If,
according to my Building Society, pre-fab houses are worth only the
value of the land on which they stand, ask yourself: 1) How much is my house/flat really worth? and 2) Why was I not told this when my
house was sold to me? The fact that NO proper plans are being made
available to the residents, the constant threats of compulsory
purchase, and the constant exhortations to carry out negotiations in
secret, all point to the fact that this scheme is of no benefit to the
people it purports to help.
WHOSE
IDEA WAS IT TO SELL THESE PROPERTIES IN THE FIRST PLACE?
The
ONLY buyer for your home now is a HOUSING ASSOCIATION - LOOK OUT!
|
| While
it is probably agreed by residents of some buildings - the large blocks
of flats - that things would be improved for them if they had houses to
live in, (but not houses with a large debt hung round the
owner's neck - they must be offered a replacement home with no
excessive financial burden) , it does not follow that hundreds more
houses should be destroyed. People have bought these in good faith,
paid their mortgages, estate maintenance, council tax etc, and do not
deserve to be treated thus. It is at this stage that things seem to
move from benefiting residents to benefiting property
developers/builders. These are the houses within large, grassed areas,
with mature trees, where it is safe for children to play, picnic etc,
and families to hold barbecues, parties etc. While GBC is happy to
support the 17th Century Village in Gosport, it is doubtful that they
wish to see genuine 21st century housing built. |
| If
some imagination were to be used in the planning of these new houses,
we could be looking at the sort of dwellings found at these two sites,
which are just two of many. BedZed and Dancing Rabbit.
From the little information supplied so far, it's normal developer
plans. ie: No imagination. |
| The
website that is supposed to keep residents informed of public meetings
etc, www.rownerrenewal.com, has finally become live - 23rd
October. The 'consultation period' seems to consist of a few hours in a
local hall, AND STILL NO MAP. We, the homeowners,
need TIME to take all this in. We need proper public meetings, with
plans available of where the proposed destruction is to take place. (I
say 'proposed', as it does
not have to happen). We need communications in writing,
not via a telephone number that residents have to pay for, with no
record of what is said, and one resident set against another. We need
regular updates on the RR website, giving people plenty of notice of
forthcoming meetings, changes in plans etc, so that busy, working
people have time to read and digest this information. We need
information from Gosport Council, an elected body, not from the local
newspaper, or an un-elected quango. We need a clear plan shown on the
RR website, showing what is planned, when, where, and who is paying for
it. Is this too much to ask in our 'democratic' country? |
|